Sql collation conflict union. Skip to main content.
Sql collation conflict union So then I was trying to collate the whitespace to this collation, but I have no idea how to do this. For Windows collations: {version}, while not present in all collation names, refers to the SQL Server version in which the collation was introduced (for the most part). Query level collation. This affects functions like SELECT statements and WHERE conditions Learn to troubleshoot and fix SQL Server collation conflicts effectively. CLOSED - General SQL Server Union Collation Conflict : Author: Topic : AskSQLTeam Ask SQLTeam Question. VPayment_1. 0. Quando instalamos o SQL Server ele possui uma collation default chamada SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. Collation issue in UNION Query. Or you could choose DATABASE_DEFAULT as your collation (the one SQL Server was installed with). I'm trying to add a table visual. To freely share his knowledge and help others build their expertise, Pinal Sounds like dbo. Eg, say you have a column c1 with collation Latin1_General_CI_AI in table Table1 and a column c2 with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS in table Table2 and you want to union the two:. Kevin writes "I have a large query that returns the following One or Need help with SQL Server Performance Tuning, contact Steve at Stedman Solutions, LLC for help, or take a look at the performance tuning page at the SteveStedman. Windows collations with no version number in the name are version 80 (meaning SQL Server 2000 as that is version 8. An error message that i found today on SQL Server management studio while I was going to do union between two table: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between If it’s UNION that is causing the sort, use UNION ALL instead. Joining Tables with Different Collations. In MS SQL SERVER, the collation can be set at the column level. Just pick the table with Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS" in the UNION operation. COLLATE issue on joining across 2 database on same SQL. Seems that you have different collation types on your database. Hola Roy, buenos dias, sucede que trate de hacer un UNION ALL con dos Vistas, que tienen los mismos campos pero la primera vista ACINOX. The types of the columns are the same (string goes to string, etc. Serial are of different collation (this is not just happening when you compare, but also when you union, concatenate, etc). Deste modo, ao realizar o UNION, o SQLServer não consegue unir tipos de Collations diferentes. Stack Overflow. Simplified version looks like this: select * from Audit. Commented Mar 10, 2016 at Find answers to problem with UNION ALL conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict. SQL Server COLLATION ISSUE. You can do this by changing the underlying column(s) or by specifying a I have a Power BI project and I'm using DirectQuery. 0). PolicyList_CurrencyFlip_t pl Both tables are in the same When you compare/aggregate columns with different collations you must coherence at least one of them to the collation you want, using the COLLATE expression. PolicyList_t pl union select * from Audit. Solving a Collation Problem between Two Tables. TableCustomers UNION ALL select distinct CustNo . Pinal has authored 14 SQL Server database books and 88 Pluralsight courses. cat_id . – pmbAustin. Collation refers to a set of rules that determine how data is sorted and compared. Agora, imaginem "Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in the equal to operation" My problem is not unique and I have searched for this quite a lot, but solutions available suggest me to override queries with some code which is not feasible. com blog. It's also useful for temp table and table variables, and where you may not know the server collation (eg you are a vendor placing your system on the customer's server) 如下图，不管是 UNION，还是UNION ALL，最终的表字段顺序会以第一张表 user1 的字段顺序为准，这就会产生一个问题，我 user4 表中，passwor 和 username 顺序是反着的，因为没有转化，就会导致查询到的结果中，user4 表的查询结果，用户的密码 password 被当作 username，用户的 username 被当作 password；table2 有A Aquí te presento una lista de las mejores prácticas para manejar collations en SQL Server: Establece una collation predeterminada para la base de datos: Es importante elegir la collation adecuada para la base de datos desde el principio, ya que esto puede evitar problemas de compatibilidad en el futuro. It still gives me the error, even though i explicitly try to use same collate std - neither works. "Cannot resolve collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT statement column 2. GGI2014 was indeed created with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. About; Products How to fix a collation conflict in a SQL Server query. This removes hardcoding the collation name which could change. name collate Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. SELECT * FROM [FAEB]. 文章浏览阅读1. ALTER DATABASE What if it's a UNION between two separate databases on two separate servers (via Linked Server)? – Fandango68. This is very unlikely, as it requires rebuilding system databases. If you have duplicates to delete, try doing the UNION ALL in a Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 15 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "French_CS_AI" in the equal to operation. 二、问题分析 上面出现的问题是由于排序规则冲突（collation Msg 451, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 1 in SELECT statement. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. [ExportaComisiones] AS f JOIN [zCredifiel]. columns -- SQL 2005 format To change the collation in SQL I perform a union on two queries. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AI” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS” in the like SQL Union overview, usage and examples; Solutions. Select City COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT AS Place, State, Country FROM DEPT1 UNION ALL Select '' AS Place, 'Arizona' As State, Country FROM DEPT2 but If If do this it also give Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AS” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS” in the equal to operation. Mar 17, 2006 #1 Is it possible to ignore collation in my sql or something like that, just to make my sql to work? George . How to use the COLLATE in a JOIN in SQL Server? 0. VPayment_2. the 2 is visible in table design mode in SSMS or when you issue select * from sys. Fixes: As per the Microsoft changing the server level collation is not a Collation defines how SQL Server compares string values, and is specified at various levels within SQL Server: Server default collation: This is specified as an option when installing SQL Server, and defines the collation that will be used for any new databases, as well as that of the master and temp databases. Commented Dec 12, 2019 If the column from the subquery (containing the UNION ALL with the collation mismatch) is not the first parameter of the CONCAT function, State 9, Line 23 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_EBCDIC278_CP1_CS_AS" in the concat operation. (If you do UNION ALL, you don't need to do this - because no duplicate elimination is done. Has a European Union party, group, or MEP openly called on the United Kingdom to Any help on this particular error? I don't sql. My attempt: Pinal Dave is an SQL Server Performance Tuning Expert and independent consultant with over 22 years of hands-on experience. Does anyone know what this or how to fix my query? Thanks in advance! How Do You Collate in an Union All Statement Forum but now I need to bring together two sets of data with different collation by using UNION ALL. When I run the query it shows the error: Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 1 in statement. PROPERTYREF COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS I union all the distinct columns of the INFORMATION_SCHEMA. It doesn't because you've not identified which column uses which collation. ID from TblTest t1right outer join t2. When I look in SMS, as well as query: Since you've mentioned that QuestionID in each table is varchar, it's probably the comparison between those. Solution 2: Fix the collation on the column. temp_po. To freely share his knowledge and help others build their expertise, Pinal SELECT * FROM [TABLEA] UNION ALL SELECT * FROM [TABLEB] Msg 457, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS" in UNION ALL Se aplica a: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) Punto de conexión de análisis SQL en Microsoft Fabric Almacenamiento en Microsoft Fabric La precedencia de intercalación, también conocida como reglas de coerción de intercalación, determina los dos resultados siguientes: Collation In Sql Server: Collation is set of rules that determine how data is sorted and compared. ) – jarlh. There are a couple of fixes: Change one view or both to use the same collation for those columns. Check more info about collation in MSDN Change Column Collation If the collation conflict is pervasive and you're consistently running into issues with certain columns, consider changing the collation of the columns involved to a common collation using ALTER TABLE. SQL Server 2005 select t1. Solução 1 Altere o Collation de um dos bancos de dados para ser igual ao do outro. Solution. 既然排序规则如此复杂，那么应用了不同排序规则的列之间默认情况下便不能进行Union、Join、Like等equal操作了，于是便有了排序规则（collation）冲突。 排序规则（collation）冲突 . Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AI” and “Latin1_General_CI_AS” in the UNION operation. Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 2 in statement. Database A is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. Reason For Collation Conflict: You faced mismatches in levels of collation between the the tables. 3. 我们知道，SQL Server Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict. O que é uma COLLATION? O que é uma COLLATION? O Collation nada mais é do que a forma de codificação de caracteres que um banco de dados utiliza para interpretá-los. to one of the select's to force the wanted collation. Collation with union and tempdb. Other system dbs have same 'except for' msdb, which has SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. SELECT c1 Applies to: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) SQL analytics endpoint in Microsoft Fabric Warehouse in Microsoft Fabric Collations in SQL Server provide sorting rules, case, and accent sensitivity properties for your data. ID t2 on ถ้าเป็น Union หละคะ Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 35 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "French_CS_AI" in the equal to operation. Name collate SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS as Column_Name" it worked perfectly well. SELECT PATINDEX((CASE WHEN id > 10 THEN GreekCol ELSE LatinCol END), 'a') FROM TestTab; 结果集如下。 Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Server LEIH2, Line 1 Cannot resolve collation conflict for patindex operation. SQL: Collation conflict between two different collations. statement is like this. I have the following SQL script, trying to perform a union on two tables located on the same database. When you use where clause in T-SQL these collation can be used to indicate whether the value is case sensitive or not. Temp tables table the collation of the temp database, not the main database you are using. The collation is different between two of your columns. Collation conflict within the same database. PaymentType and dbo. Currently sql has four level of collation (Server,Database,Table & Column). Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. So, what can we learn from this example? First, we cannot join tables or columns when there is a conflict in collation between the objects. Fala Pessoal, O foco desse post não é explicar o que é uma collation, mas sim contar uma experiência de duas situações que já passei. However, I strongly suggest reading Simons Liew's excellent article Understanding the COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT clause in SQL Server. But, you shouldn't need our help now. [dbo]. Where this is truly not possible (all structures are dynamic) I'd question the wisdom of doing it all in T-SQL to begin with, but some sort of dynamic SQL seems unavoidable in this Of course we all like our colleagues to think that we know everything there is to know about SQL Server Collations. I changed the collation on the database using . dbo. SQL Server no resuelve de manera automática las conversiones entre un collate y otro, por esto mismo, cuándo hay operaciones con columnas con diferente colación, debes indicar explicitamente qué columna(s) quieres convertir de su colación actual a otra para que se realice la operación, sea esta una comparación, concatenación u otra que abarque varias columnas. Since you have Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Tengo dos bases de Datos: EXACTUS y CENTRAL EXACTUS tiene en COLLATE Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_AltDiction_CP850_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. 但是当从Web Server开始访问的时候出现错误Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Chinese_PRC_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. ” 问题 Cannot resolve collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Persian_100_CI_AI_SC_UTF8" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT [ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]A collation conflict in the UNION ALL operator cannot be resolved. SELECT Col1, Col2 FROM Table1 UNION ALL SELECT Col1, Col2 FROM Table2 where col1 and col2 are strings and using collations. Server. Why: Because Category. Collations that are used with character data types, such as select tr. Server has collation Latin1_General_CI_AS. How to fix a collation conflict in a SQL Server query. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between [collation1] and [collation2] or set operation (like UNION) to have the same collation, and it doesn’t automatically resolve differences. I already tried changing in the design menu from Windows collation to As a general rule, you can use Database_Default collation so you don't need to figure out which one to use. SQL Server doesn’t support automatic collation casting when executing a query with a comparison of two columns with different collations. Thanks a lot!!!! Applies to: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) SQL analytics endpoint in Microsoft Fabric Warehouse in Microsoft Fabric Collation precedence, also known as collation coercion rules, determines the following two outcomes: The collation of the final result of an expression that is Let's see about the possibilities. Add the COLLATE clause with the proper collation name to one side or the other. It's truly great for operations that need to be sensitive to the environment, especially when that environment might change or if the code gets deployed to various places that don't have a guarantee of using the Understanding Collation in SQL Server. My SQL Collation needs to be specified wherever strings from different collations are compared, commonly after a JOIN or WHERE condition. CREATE VIEW [dbo]. 2k次。两个数据库的字符集不同，我们在进行union 等操作时，会出现字符集冲突错误．例如：SELECT ISNULL (Report_No,’’) as ReportNo FROM SYSSCAN_WDC_ETSSR_report_masterUNIONSELECT ISNULL (Report_No ,’’) as ReportNo FROM InspectionMPI_MasterC–出现错误：cannot resolve the collation conflict between Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in UNION ALL operator. (#451) Hot Network Questions Confused by 昇華する: used more often Pinal Dave is an SQL Server Performance Tuning Expert and independent consultant with over 22 years of hands-on experience. Sort by date Sort by votes Mar 17, 2006; 1 #2 SQLDenis Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company Visit the blog Para conectarse a Sql Server desde linux utilizamos este comando para instalar el driver: [bash] $ sudo yum install -y php-mssql [/bash] Por ejemplo, para php5. [optPerson] AS p ON A general purpose way is to coerce the collation to DATABASE_DEFAULT. Collation is a mess on the instance - half the databases have one collation, half have the other. Posted - 2004-02-23 : 09:13:09. @Charlieface Thanks for that feedback 😺. All three queries will return row counts of one, because the database collation is case sensitive. 6: [bash] $ sudo yum install -y php56w-mssql [/bash] Esta instrucción instala freetds, una colección de librerias para conectarnos con Sql Server desde linux. 2. INTO is convenient, but you can always specify explicit columns and collations. He holds a Masters of Science degree and numerous database certifications. Database Default Collation Collation can be specified per column, so one or more of your *char-type columns will have a different collation to the column you are comparing to. Any one please help. Reply; Félix Santos González. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between Thai_CI_AI and Thai_CI_AS in the equal to operation. ) VS自带的SQL Server数据库（Express版本），查询时遇到的 “Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'National'. Query : ALTER TABLE T1 ALTER COLUMN Col1 COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS (OR DATABASE_DEFAULT for example) The goal is to An example: select distinct CustomerNo from DB1. SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS is SQL Server’s default collation which is case insensitive. GENERAL_Contrato_Detalles los campos NOMBRE_Area, nombre y Representante de la BD ACINOX tienen el Colation en SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS y en SQL 无法解决Union select中的排序规则冲突问题 在本文中，我们将介绍SQL中的一个常见问题，即无法解决Union select操作中的排序规则冲突问题。 阅读更多：SQL 教程 什么是排序规则冲突？ 排序规则冲突问题通常出现在使用Union操作符时。Union操作符用于将两个或多个查询的结果集合并为一个新的结果集。 There is no joins , only union all. The first one is that server's collation has changed. Details: DataSourceKind=SQL DataSourcePath=kt-sql01;RptViews Message=Cannot resolve Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Turkish_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Re: DATABASE_DEFAULT, I realize that it's a fairly popular option, but I believe it's used more often than it should be. Msg 468, Level 16, Collation conflict in SQL Union All Query. ”与 “Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Chinese_PRC_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Cannot resolve the collation conflict in my query. The collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS is used to treat the value of a column as Case Sensetive. As you can see, COLLATIONS can affect a query, in a concatenation in the SELECT clause, in a comparison in WHERE clause, and JOIN clause. OD1 and STR_IndentDetail. name from sys. Skip to main content. So at a guess, try changing the line: Awesome tips Larnu and Aaron! One of you can post this as an answer so I can except it! By adding to the select list collation as follows: ",c. However, the truth is that it is a rather complicated topic to fully understand and the cost of getting collation wrong can be great. 50. Database default collation: This My guess would be that you have a temp table of a different collation in the mix. The conflict is originated by the difference in collation between the instance and the vendor database. COLUMNS views of many databases which I query with a direct [ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]A collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the UNION ALL operator occurring in the 4 column of the SELECT statement cannot be I am trying to make a Union between two tables, and I get the following error: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Chinese_Hong_Kong_Stroke_90_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. If only one could ask certain questions on forums or at conferences without blushing. so i need to know is there any quick way to fix this issue. This has been changed in SMS and the instance has been restarted, also in SMS. Eu particularmente, utilizo na maioria das vezes a collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI. Help is at hand, because Robert Foros del Web » Programación para mayores de 30 ;) » Bases de Datos General » SQL Server » [SOLUCIONADO] Problema con el COLLATE Estas en el tema de Problema con el COLLATE en el foro de SQL Server en Foros del Web. Commented Jun 11, 2019 at 19:37 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operations. . ALTER TABLE TableA ALTER COLUMN Column1 VARCHAR(100) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS; 3. This happens because the collations on #tempdb. Cannot resolve collation conflict for UNION operation 1. November 17, 2016 3:10 pm. Error: Microsoft SQL: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_100_CS_AS" in the equal to operation. Why don't you populate the temp tables "correctly", so they don't conflict in collation later? I know SELECT . For example, if the problem was the LIVE_PROPS table: INNER JOIN LIVE_PROPS AS lp WITH (NOLOCK) ON j. cid column has different collate than search. To get around this you can specify the collation of columns or force a collation using the COLLATE clause when joining two columns. POPERTYREF = lp. In our case, was not possible because the vendor does not support SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation. D1 are different (and specifically, note that #tempdb is a different, system database, which is generally why it will have a default opinion for collation, unlike your own databases and tables where you may have provided more specific opinions). 1. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the concat operation. DataSource. triggers tr union all select tr. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS” in the equal to operation. I often solve this problem just make both table collation same. Before we delve into resolving collation conflicts, it’s essential to have a clear understanding of what collation is and how it functions in SQL Server. 0 Posts. Collation help needed. With a UNION, the columns in each Once you've noted the server & column collations, you can take care of your collation conflict by following this example: DROP TABLE CollationTest1 CREATE TABLE I am getting the error Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between If you, or anyone else, is still using SQL Server 2012 and running into this, it is best to resolve the collation conflict at the source, which is in the UNION ALL operation. Then you can have issues when joining tables or to tables in other databases, as in this case. Using Query 1 which failed with a collation conflict as an example, there are three updated version of the query which will now execute successfully without collation conflict errors. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the equal to operation I have two tables - Table1 as linuxdata ( only one column and that Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation. Unless you have extremely dynamic environment with multiple admins doing stuff in chaotic manner, I wouldn't consider this further. server_triggers tr; However on my local SQL Server 2012 Express installation this fails with the error: Cannot resolve collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT statement column 1 Collation conflict in SQL Union All Query. sg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS" and "Croatian_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. The e I have an SQL query like. Here are some common scenarios: 1. You don’t want to be sorting on remote data. Thread starter ASPVBNerd; Start date Mar 17, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. Use a = b COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_Pref_CP1_AS or a = b COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS as suggested by หากล่าวถึง database Collation มือใหม่ที่ใช้ database Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_100_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. The I can "fix" this by changing the statement to explicitely use a different collation in the second part of the union: select tr. The collation of both the offending columns in my database is: Latin1_General_CI_AS. Buen día, a continuación les describo mi problema. We can help with tuning a single query or with figuring out why your SQL Server is Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CS_AS" in the UNION operation. The following link gives instructions on how to change the database collation. Add COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS after the offending equal to operation. If possible change the database collation. When I drag the value I want to the table field, it gives me the following error: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. 0 什么是排序规则（collation） 关于SQL Server的排序规则，估计大家都不陌生，在创建数据库时我们经常要选择一种排序规则（conllation），一般我们会留意到每一种语言的排序规则都有许多种，比如标准大陆简体中文Chinese_PRC的排序规则就有数十种之多 这些排序规则有什 Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 103 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Modern_Spanish_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. qfzdbfcyhdmciymkdrkkefcnrrvhyvzychtyjmccxduinxnmkotwzmodvauwaelzrermmuldawar
Sql collation conflict union So then I was trying to collate the whitespace to this collation, but I have no idea how to do this. For Windows collations: {version}, while not present in all collation names, refers to the SQL Server version in which the collation was introduced (for the most part). Query level collation. This affects functions like SELECT statements and WHERE conditions Learn to troubleshoot and fix SQL Server collation conflicts effectively. CLOSED - General SQL Server Union Collation Conflict : Author: Topic : AskSQLTeam Ask SQLTeam Question. VPayment_1. 0. Quando instalamos o SQL Server ele possui uma collation default chamada SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. Collation issue in UNION Query. Or you could choose DATABASE_DEFAULT as your collation (the one SQL Server was installed with). I'm trying to add a table visual. To freely share his knowledge and help others build their expertise, Pinal Sounds like dbo. Eg, say you have a column c1 with collation Latin1_General_CI_AI in table Table1 and a column c2 with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS in table Table2 and you want to union the two:. Kevin writes "I have a large query that returns the following One or Need help with SQL Server Performance Tuning, contact Steve at Stedman Solutions, LLC for help, or take a look at the performance tuning page at the SteveStedman. Windows collations with no version number in the name are version 80 (meaning SQL Server 2000 as that is version 8. An error message that i found today on SQL Server management studio while I was going to do union between two table: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between If it’s UNION that is causing the sort, use UNION ALL instead. Joining Tables with Different Collations. In MS SQL SERVER, the collation can be set at the column level. Just pick the table with Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS" in the UNION operation. COLLATE issue on joining across 2 database on same SQL. Seems that you have different collation types on your database. Hola Roy, buenos dias, sucede que trate de hacer un UNION ALL con dos Vistas, que tienen los mismos campos pero la primera vista ACINOX. The types of the columns are the same (string goes to string, etc. Serial are of different collation (this is not just happening when you compare, but also when you union, concatenate, etc). Deste modo, ao realizar o UNION, o SQLServer não consegue unir tipos de Collations diferentes. Stack Overflow. Simplified version looks like this: select * from Audit. Commented Mar 10, 2016 at Find answers to problem with UNION ALL conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict. SQL Server COLLATION ISSUE. You can do this by changing the underlying column(s) or by specifying a I have a Power BI project and I'm using DirectQuery. 0). PolicyList_CurrencyFlip_t pl Both tables are in the same When you compare/aggregate columns with different collations you must coherence at least one of them to the collation you want, using the COLLATE expression. PolicyList_t pl union select * from Audit. Solving a Collation Problem between Two Tables. TableCustomers UNION ALL select distinct CustNo . Pinal has authored 14 SQL Server database books and 88 Pluralsight courses. cat_id . – pmbAustin. Collation refers to a set of rules that determine how data is sorted and compared. Agora, imaginem "Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in the equal to operation" My problem is not unique and I have searched for this quite a lot, but solutions available suggest me to override queries with some code which is not feasible. com blog. It's also useful for temp table and table variables, and where you may not know the server collation (eg you are a vendor placing your system on the customer's server) 如下图，不管是 UNION，还是UNION ALL，最终的表字段顺序会以第一张表 user1 的字段顺序为准，这就会产生一个问题，我 user4 表中，passwor 和 username 顺序是反着的，因为没有转化，就会导致查询到的结果中，user4 表的查询结果，用户的密码 password 被当作 username，用户的 username 被当作 password；table2 有A Aquí te presento una lista de las mejores prácticas para manejar collations en SQL Server: Establece una collation predeterminada para la base de datos: Es importante elegir la collation adecuada para la base de datos desde el principio, ya que esto puede evitar problemas de compatibilidad en el futuro. It still gives me the error, even though i explicitly try to use same collate std - neither works. "Cannot resolve collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT statement column 2. GGI2014 was indeed created with collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. About; Products How to fix a collation conflict in a SQL Server query. This removes hardcoding the collation name which could change. name collate Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. SELECT * FROM [FAEB]. 文章浏览阅读1. ALTER DATABASE What if it's a UNION between two separate databases on two separate servers (via Linked Server)? – Fandango68. This is very unlikely, as it requires rebuilding system databases. If you have duplicates to delete, try doing the UNION ALL in a Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 15 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "French_CS_AI" in the equal to operation. 二、问题分析 上面出现的问题是由于排序规则冲突（collation Msg 451, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 1 in SELECT statement. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. [ExportaComisiones] AS f JOIN [zCredifiel]. columns -- SQL 2005 format To change the collation in SQL I perform a union on two queries. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AI” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS” in the like SQL Union overview, usage and examples; Solutions. Select City COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT AS Place, State, Country FROM DEPT1 UNION ALL Select '' AS Place, 'Arizona' As State, Country FROM DEPT2 but If If do this it also give Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AS” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS” in the equal to operation. Mar 17, 2006 #1 Is it possible to ignore collation in my sql or something like that, just to make my sql to work? George . How to use the COLLATE in a JOIN in SQL Server? 0. VPayment_2. the 2 is visible in table design mode in SSMS or when you issue select * from sys. Fixes: As per the Microsoft changing the server level collation is not a Collation defines how SQL Server compares string values, and is specified at various levels within SQL Server: Server default collation: This is specified as an option when installing SQL Server, and defines the collation that will be used for any new databases, as well as that of the master and temp databases. Commented Dec 12, 2019 If the column from the subquery (containing the UNION ALL with the collation mismatch) is not the first parameter of the CONCAT function, State 9, Line 23 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_EBCDIC278_CP1_CS_AS" in the concat operation. (If you do UNION ALL, you don't need to do this - because no duplicate elimination is done. Has a European Union party, group, or MEP openly called on the United Kingdom to Any help on this particular error? I don't sql. My attempt: Pinal Dave is an SQL Server Performance Tuning Expert and independent consultant with over 22 years of hands-on experience. Does anyone know what this or how to fix my query? Thanks in advance! How Do You Collate in an Union All Statement Forum but now I need to bring together two sets of data with different collation by using UNION ALL. When I run the query it shows the error: Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 1 in statement. PROPERTYREF COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS I union all the distinct columns of the INFORMATION_SCHEMA. It doesn't because you've not identified which column uses which collation. ID from TblTest t1right outer join t2. When I look in SMS, as well as query: Since you've mentioned that QuestionID in each table is varchar, it's probably the comparison between those. Solution 2: Fix the collation on the column. temp_po. To freely share his knowledge and help others build their expertise, Pinal SELECT * FROM [TABLEA] UNION ALL SELECT * FROM [TABLEB] Msg 457, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS" in UNION ALL Se aplica a: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) Punto de conexión de análisis SQL en Microsoft Fabric Almacenamiento en Microsoft Fabric La precedencia de intercalación, también conocida como reglas de coerción de intercalación, determina los dos resultados siguientes: Collation In Sql Server: Collation is set of rules that determine how data is sorted and compared. ) – jarlh. There are a couple of fixes: Change one view or both to use the same collation for those columns. Check more info about collation in MSDN Change Column Collation If the collation conflict is pervasive and you're consistently running into issues with certain columns, consider changing the collation of the columns involved to a common collation using ALTER TABLE. SQL Server 2005 select t1. Solução 1 Altere o Collation de um dos bancos de dados para ser igual ao do outro. Solution. 既然排序规则如此复杂，那么应用了不同排序规则的列之间默认情况下便不能进行Union、Join、Like等equal操作了，于是便有了排序规则（collation）冲突。 排序规则（collation）冲突 . Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “Latin1_General_CI_AI” and “Latin1_General_CI_AS” in the UNION operation. Cannot resolve collation conflict for column 2 in statement. Database A is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. Reason For Collation Conflict: You faced mismatches in levels of collation between the the tables. 3. 我们知道，SQL Server Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict. O que é uma COLLATION? O que é uma COLLATION? O Collation nada mais é do que a forma de codificação de caracteres que um banco de dados utiliza para interpretá-los. to one of the select's to force the wanted collation. Collation with union and tempdb. Other system dbs have same 'except for' msdb, which has SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. SELECT c1 Applies to: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) SQL analytics endpoint in Microsoft Fabric Warehouse in Microsoft Fabric Collations in SQL Server provide sorting rules, case, and accent sensitivity properties for your data. ID t2 on ถ้าเป็น Union หละคะ Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 35 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "French_CS_AI" in the equal to operation. Name collate SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS as Column_Name" it worked perfectly well. SELECT PATINDEX((CASE WHEN id > 10 THEN GreekCol ELSE LatinCol END), 'a') FROM TestTab; 结果集如下。 Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Server LEIH2, Line 1 Cannot resolve collation conflict for patindex operation. SQL: Collation conflict between two different collations. statement is like this. I have the following SQL script, trying to perform a union on two tables located on the same database. When you use where clause in T-SQL these collation can be used to indicate whether the value is case sensitive or not. Temp tables table the collation of the temp database, not the main database you are using. The collation is different between two of your columns. Collation conflict within the same database. PaymentType and dbo. Currently sql has four level of collation (Server,Database,Table & Column). Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. So, what can we learn from this example? First, we cannot join tables or columns when there is a conflict in collation between the objects. Fala Pessoal, O foco desse post não é explicar o que é uma collation, mas sim contar uma experiência de duas situações que já passei. However, I strongly suggest reading Simons Liew's excellent article Understanding the COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT clause in SQL Server. But, you shouldn't need our help now. [dbo]. Where this is truly not possible (all structures are dynamic) I'd question the wisdom of doing it all in T-SQL to begin with, but some sort of dynamic SQL seems unavoidable in this Of course we all like our colleagues to think that we know everything there is to know about SQL Server Collations. I changed the collation on the database using . dbo. SQL Server no resuelve de manera automática las conversiones entre un collate y otro, por esto mismo, cuándo hay operaciones con columnas con diferente colación, debes indicar explicitamente qué columna(s) quieres convertir de su colación actual a otra para que se realice la operación, sea esta una comparación, concatenación u otra que abarque varias columnas. Since you have Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Tengo dos bases de Datos: EXACTUS y CENTRAL EXACTUS tiene en COLLATE Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_AltDiction_CP850_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. 但是当从Web Server开始访问的时候出现错误Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Chinese_PRC_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. ” 问题 Cannot resolve collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Persian_100_CI_AI_SC_UTF8" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT [ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]A collation conflict in the UNION ALL operator cannot be resolved. SELECT Col1, Col2 FROM Table1 UNION ALL SELECT Col1, Col2 FROM Table2 where col1 and col2 are strings and using collations. Server. Why: Because Category. Collations that are used with character data types, such as select tr. Server has collation Latin1_General_CI_AS. How to fix a collation conflict in a SQL Server query. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between [collation1] and [collation2] or set operation (like UNION) to have the same collation, and it doesn’t automatically resolve differences. I already tried changing in the design menu from Windows collation to As a general rule, you can use Database_Default collation so you don't need to figure out which one to use. SQL Server doesn’t support automatic collation casting when executing a query with a comparison of two columns with different collations. Thanks a lot!!!! Applies to: SQL Server Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) SQL analytics endpoint in Microsoft Fabric Warehouse in Microsoft Fabric Collation precedence, also known as collation coercion rules, determines the following two outcomes: The collation of the final result of an expression that is Let's see about the possibilities. Add the COLLATE clause with the proper collation name to one side or the other. It's truly great for operations that need to be sensitive to the environment, especially when that environment might change or if the code gets deployed to various places that don't have a guarantee of using the Understanding Collation in SQL Server. My SQL Collation needs to be specified wherever strings from different collations are compared, commonly after a JOIN or WHERE condition. CREATE VIEW [dbo]. 2k次。两个数据库的字符集不同，我们在进行union 等操作时，会出现字符集冲突错误．例如：SELECT ISNULL (Report_No,’’) as ReportNo FROM SYSSCAN_WDC_ETSSR_report_masterUNIONSELECT ISNULL (Report_No ,’’) as ReportNo FROM InspectionMPI_MasterC–出现错误：cannot resolve the collation conflict between Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in UNION ALL operator. (#451) Hot Network Questions Confused by 昇華する: used more often Pinal Dave is an SQL Server Performance Tuning Expert and independent consultant with over 22 years of hands-on experience. Sort by date Sort by votes Mar 17, 2006; 1 #2 SQLDenis Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company Visit the blog Para conectarse a Sql Server desde linux utilizamos este comando para instalar el driver: [bash] $ sudo yum install -y php-mssql [/bash] Por ejemplo, para php5. [optPerson] AS p ON A general purpose way is to coerce the collation to DATABASE_DEFAULT. Collation is a mess on the instance - half the databases have one collation, half have the other. Posted - 2004-02-23 : 09:13:09. @Charlieface Thanks for that feedback 😺. All three queries will return row counts of one, because the database collation is case sensitive. 6: [bash] $ sudo yum install -y php56w-mssql [/bash] Esta instrucción instala freetds, una colección de librerias para conectarnos con Sql Server desde linux. 2. INTO is convenient, but you can always specify explicit columns and collations. He holds a Masters of Science degree and numerous database certifications. Database Default Collation Collation can be specified per column, so one or more of your *char-type columns will have a different collation to the column you are comparing to. Any one please help. Reply; Félix Santos González. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between Thai_CI_AI and Thai_CI_AS in the equal to operation. ) VS自带的SQL Server数据库（Express版本），查询时遇到的 “Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'National'. Query : ALTER TABLE T1 ALTER COLUMN Col1 COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS (OR DATABASE_DEFAULT for example) The goal is to An example: select distinct CustomerNo from DB1. SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS is SQL Server’s default collation which is case insensitive. GENERAL_Contrato_Detalles los campos NOMBRE_Area, nombre y Representante de la BD ACINOX tienen el Colation en SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS y en SQL 无法解决Union select中的排序规则冲突问题 在本文中，我们将介绍SQL中的一个常见问题，即无法解决Union select操作中的排序规则冲突问题。 阅读更多：SQL 教程 什么是排序规则冲突？ 排序规则冲突问题通常出现在使用Union操作符时。Union操作符用于将两个或多个查询的结果集合并为一个新的结果集。 There is no joins , only union all. The first one is that server's collation has changed. Details: DataSourceKind=SQL DataSourcePath=kt-sql01;RptViews Message=Cannot resolve Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Turkish_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Re: DATABASE_DEFAULT, I realize that it's a fairly popular option, but I believe it's used more often than it should be. Msg 468, Level 16, Collation conflict in SQL Union All Query. ”与 “Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Chinese_PRC_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. Cannot resolve the collation conflict in my query. The collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS is used to treat the value of a column as Case Sensetive. As you can see, COLLATIONS can affect a query, in a concatenation in the SELECT clause, in a comparison in WHERE clause, and JOIN clause. OD1 and STR_IndentDetail. name from sys. Skip to main content. So at a guess, try changing the line: Awesome tips Larnu and Aaron! One of you can post this as an answer so I can except it! By adding to the select list collation as follows: ",c. However, the truth is that it is a rather complicated topic to fully understand and the cost of getting collation wrong can be great. 50. Database default collation: This My guess would be that you have a temp table of a different collation in the mix. The conflict is originated by the difference in collation between the instance and the vendor database. COLUMNS views of many databases which I query with a direct [ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]A collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the UNION ALL operator occurring in the 4 column of the SELECT statement cannot be I am trying to make a Union between two tables, and I get the following error: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Chinese_Hong_Kong_Stroke_90_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. If only one could ask certain questions on forums or at conferences without blushing. so i need to know is there any quick way to fix this issue. This has been changed in SMS and the instance has been restarted, also in SMS. Eu particularmente, utilizo na maioria das vezes a collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI. Help is at hand, because Robert Foros del Web » Programación para mayores de 30 ;) » Bases de Datos General » SQL Server » [SOLUCIONADO] Problema con el COLLATE Estas en el tema de Problema con el COLLATE en el foro de SQL Server en Foros del Web. Commented Jun 11, 2019 at 19:37 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operations. . ALTER TABLE TableA ALTER COLUMN Column1 VARCHAR(100) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS; 3. This happens because the collations on #tempdb. Cannot resolve collation conflict for UNION operation 1. November 17, 2016 3:10 pm. Error: Microsoft SQL: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_100_CS_AS" in the equal to operation. Why don't you populate the temp tables "correctly", so they don't conflict in collation later? I know SELECT . For example, if the problem was the LIVE_PROPS table: INNER JOIN LIVE_PROPS AS lp WITH (NOLOCK) ON j. cid column has different collate than search. To get around this you can specify the collation of columns or force a collation using the COLLATE clause when joining two columns. POPERTYREF = lp. In our case, was not possible because the vendor does not support SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation. D1 are different (and specifically, note that #tempdb is a different, system database, which is generally why it will have a default opinion for collation, unlike your own databases and tables where you may have provided more specific opinions). 1. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the concat operation. DataSource. triggers tr union all select tr. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AI” and “SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS” in the equal to operation. I often solve this problem just make both table collation same. Before we delve into resolving collation conflicts, it’s essential to have a clear understanding of what collation is and how it functions in SQL Server. 0 Posts. Collation help needed. With a UNION, the columns in each Once you've noted the server & column collations, you can take care of your collation conflict by following this example: DROP TABLE CollationTest1 CREATE TABLE I am getting the error Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar cannot be performed because the collation of the value is unresolved due to a collation conflict between If you, or anyone else, is still using SQL Server 2012 and running into this, it is best to resolve the collation conflict at the source, which is in the UNION ALL operation. Then you can have issues when joining tables or to tables in other databases, as in this case. Using Query 1 which failed with a collation conflict as an example, there are three updated version of the query which will now execute successfully without collation conflict errors. Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the equal to operation I have two tables - Table1 as linuxdata ( only one column and that Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation. Unless you have extremely dynamic environment with multiple admins doing stuff in chaotic manner, I wouldn't consider this further. server_triggers tr; However on my local SQL Server 2012 Express installation this fails with the error: Cannot resolve collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AI" in UNION ALL operator occurring in SELECT statement column 1 Collation conflict in SQL Union All Query. sg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Serbian_Latin_100_CI_AS" and "Croatian_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. The e I have an SQL query like. Here are some common scenarios: 1. You don’t want to be sorting on remote data. Thread starter ASPVBNerd; Start date Mar 17, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. Use a = b COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_Pref_CP1_AS or a = b COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS as suggested by หากล่าวถึง database Collation มือใหม่ที่ใช้ database Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_100_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. The I can "fix" this by changing the statement to explicitely use a different collation in the second part of the union: select tr. The collation of both the offending columns in my database is: Latin1_General_CI_AS. Buen día, a continuación les describo mi problema. We can help with tuning a single query or with figuring out why your SQL Server is Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CS_AS" in the UNION operation. The following link gives instructions on how to change the database collation. Add COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS after the offending equal to operation. If possible change the database collation. When I drag the value I want to the table field, it gives me the following error: Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. 0 什么是排序规则（collation） 关于SQL Server的排序规则，估计大家都不陌生，在创建数据库时我们经常要选择一种排序规则（conllation），一般我们会留意到每一种语言的排序规则都有许多种，比如标准大陆简体中文Chinese_PRC的排序规则就有数十种之多 这些排序规则有什 Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 103 Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Modern_Spanish_CI_AS" in the equal to operation. qfz dbfcy hdmci ymkdrkke fcn rrvhy vzych tyjm ccxd uinxnmkot wzmod vauwa elzrer mmu ldawar